The group aims to analyse unwritten legal and political constitutional norms in the context of the functioning of formal (written) constitutions in the contemporary state. Unwritten constitutional norms take various forms and often hold a contentious status. Broadly defined, they include customary legal norms and constitutional customs (such as conventions) that influence the behaviour of legal subjects. Typically, constitutional customs are not regarded as formal legal norms. A thesis of particular relevance to this research, supported by established constitutional law scholarship, posits that even in systems governed by a formally codified constitution, there exists a body of unwritten norms with a mixed (legal-political) nature. Such norms can embody characteristics intrinsic to the concept of a constitution, notably possessing unique legal authority in the hierarchy of sources of law. In this context, the relationship between unwritten constitutional norms and constitutional interpretation also emerges as a focal point. An important element of the research is the attempt to confirm that unwritten norms can positively influence the constitutional system and strengthen the protection of the written constitution. The central premise is that norms embedded in the legal culture of a particular state may be more readily accepted by political stakeholders.




